[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

This PR appears to mostly meet the NuttX requirements, but is missing some key information:

Strengths:

• Summary: Clearly outlines the "why," "what," and "how" of the changes. The reference to the NuttX Apps PR is good.
• Testing: Mentions CI and a related NuttX Apps PR with a test case, which is a good start.

Areas for Improvement:

• Impact: "N/A" is too vague. While some sections might truly have no impact, you need to explicitly state that for each one. For example:
  • Impact on user: NO - No user-facing API changes.
  • Impact on build: MAYBE - If the new cmd introduces new build dependencies, describe them. Otherwise, state NO.
  • Impact on hardware: NO - (Assuming this is purely software-based)
  • Impact on documentation: YES - Needs updates to describe the new cmd and asynchronous usage of the crypto driver.
  • Impact on security: Potentially YES - Asynchronous crypto operations can have security implications. Carefully analyze and document any potential risks or considerations.
  • Impact on compatibility: NO - (Assuming no breaking changes)
• Testing:
  • Be specific: Mention the specific CI environments (OS, architectures) used.
  • Target details: Provide more details about the target(s) used for testing beyond just "arch." Include the specific board and configurations.
  • Testing logs: The PR should include actual testing logs, not placeholders.

Recommendation:

Revise the PR description to address the missing information. Being thorough and explicit, especially in the "Impact" and "Testing" sections, will make it easier for reviewers to evaluate the PR.